Multidisciplinary healthcare committees meet regularly to discuss patients’ candidacy for emerging functional neurosurgical procedures, such as Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS). Through debate and discussion around the surgical candidacy of particular patients, functional neurosurgery programs begin to mold practice and policy supported both by scientific evidence and clear value choices. These neurosurgical decisions have special considerations not found in non-neurologic committees. The professional time used to resolve these conflicts provides opportunities for the emergence of careful, ethical practices simultaneous with the expansion of therapy applications
- DBS, Deep Brian Simulation
- Deep Brain Stimulation
- informed consent
- Patient Care Committee
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: none declared
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Deep brain stimulation: a return journey from psychiatry to neurology
- Paediatric deep brain stimulation: ethical considerations in malignant Tourette syndrome
- Functional lesional neurosurgery for tremor: back to the future?
- Deep brain stimulation: practical insights and common queries
- The burden of normality: from ‘chronically ill’ to ‘symptom free’. New ethical challenges for deep brain stimulation postoperative treatment
- Deep brain stimulation in 18 patients with severe Gilles de la Tourette syndrome refractory to treatment: the surgery and stimulation
- Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders
- Adoption of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor: why so much fuss about FUS?
- Outcomes from stereotactic surgery for essential tremor
- Bilateral stimulation of the caudal zona incerta nucleus for tremor control