Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Conflicts of interest in divisions of general practice
  1. N Palmer1,
  2. A Braunack-Mayer1,
  3. W Rogers2,
  4. C Provis3,
  5. G Cullity4
  1. 1Discipline of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia
  2. 2Department of Medical Education, Flinders University, Adelaide
  3. 3School of Management, University of South Australia, Adelaide
  4. 4Discipline of Philosophy, University of Adelaide
  1. Correspondence to:
 A Braunack-Mayer
 Discipline of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Level 9, 10 Pulteney Street, Mail Drop 207, South Australia 5005;annette.braunackmayer{at}


Community-based healthcare organisations manage competing, and often conflicting, priorities. These conflicts can arise from the multiple roles these organisations take up, and from the diverse range of stakeholders to whom they must be responsive. Often such conflicts may be titled conflicts of interest; however, what precisely constitutes such conflicts and what should be done about them is not always clear. Clarity about the duties owed by organisations and the roles they assume can help identify and manage some of these conflicts. Taking divisions of general practice in Australia as an example, this paper sets out to distinguish two main types of conflicts of interest, so that they may be more clearly identified and more effectively managed.

  • DGPs, Divisions of General Practice

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Competing interests: None.