Article Text
Abstract
In the UK, many fundamentally important policy decisions that are likely to affect the relationship between citizens and care services are now made at the sublegislative level and without adequate ethical consideration and scrutiny. This is well exemplified in the proposed guidance on the disclosure of information on children. A recent consultation paper by the UK government on the subject proposes an approach that seeks a simple technical solution to a complex problem, emphasising control and surveillance. This reflects pressure to be seen to act. The document fails with regard to ethical reflection appropriate to the complexity of the issue, an appreciation of complex relationships of trust, and a proper sense of the richness and complexity of the public interest. Such policies would, if implemented, fundamentally change the relationships between citizens and their carers, and among carers and the law and the state. This and similar proposals require far more ethical scrutiny and consideration of the public interest in the widest sense.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Competing interests: SP and HME are members of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ Committee on Medical Ethics.
Other content recommended for you
- Sharing information about domestic violence and abuse in healthcare: an analysis of English guidance and recommendations for good practice
- GMC confidentiality guidance 2017
- Family history and adoption in the UK: conflicts of interest in medical disclosure
- Confidentiality in medicine: how far should doctors prioritise the confidentiality of the individual they are treating?
- Parental procreative obligation and the categorisation of disease: the case of cystic fibrosis
- Children’s and caregivers’ perspectives about mandatory reporting of child maltreatment: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
- Overlap of premature birth and permissible abortion
- A mobile revolution for healthcare? Setting the agenda for bioethics
- Absent virtues: the poacher becomes gamekeeper
- Bioethics: why philosophy is essential for progress