Article Text
Abstract
Background and objective: Assuming the hypothesis that the general practitioner (GP) can and should be a key player in making end-of-life decisions for hospitalised patients, perceptions of GPs’ role assigned to them by hospital doctors in making withdrawal decisions for such patients were surveyed.
Design: Questionnaire survey.
Setting: Urban (districts located near Paris) and rural (southern France) areas.
Participants: GPs.
Results: The response rate was 32.2% (161/500), and it was observed that 70.8% of respondents believed that their participation in withdrawal decisions for their hospitalised patients was essential, whereas 42.1% believed that the hospital doctors were sufficiently skilled to make withdrawal decisions without input from the GPs. Most respondents were found to believe that they had the necessary skills (91.9%) and enough time (87.6%) to participate in withdrawal decisions. The last case of treatment withdrawal in hospital for one of their patients was described by 40% (65/161) of respondents, of whom only 40.0% (26/65) believed that they had participated actively in the decision process. The major factors in the multivariate analysis were the GP’s strong belief that his or her participation was essential (p = 0.01), information on admission of the patient given to the GP by the hospital department (p = 0.007), rural practice (p = 0.03), visit to the patient dying in hospital (p = 0.02) and a request by the family to be kept informed about the patient (p = 0.003).
Conclusion: Strong interest was evinced among GPs regarding end-of-life issues, as well as considerable experience of patients dying at home. As GPs are more closely corrected to patients’ families, they may be a good choice for third-party intervention in making end-of-life decisions for hospitalised patients.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Competing interests: None.
-
Contributors: EF: conception and design, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the article; PJ: analysis and interpretation of the data, statistical expertise; CH, SF-C, FM, CV-G: conception and design; FL, PD, JM: drafting of the article, critical revision of the article for important intellectual content.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Long-term outcomes among stable post-acute myocardial infarction patients living in rural versus urban areas: insights from the prospective, observational TIGRIS registry
- Factors affecting physicians' decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatments in terminal care
- Euthanasia and other end of life decisions and care provided in final three months of life: nationwide retrospective study in Belgium
- Variation in appropriate diabetes care and treatment targets in urban and rural areas in England: an observational study of the ‘rule of halves’
- General practice physicians’ and nurses’ self-reported multidisciplinary end-of-life care: a systematic review
- Defining the palliative care patient: its challenges and implications for service delivery
- Defining the palliative care patient: its challenges and implications for service delivery
- Prevalence and associated factors of hypertension in selected urban and rural areas of Dhaka, Bangladesh: findings from SHASTO baseline survey
- Regional differences in the patient population of general practices in northern Germany: results of a mixed-methods study
- Provision of end-of-life care in primary care: a survey of issues and outcomes in the Australian context