There has been longstanding interest in the consistency of decisions made by research ethics committees (RECs) in the UK, but most of the evidence has come from single studies submitted to multiple committees. A systematic comparison was carried out of the decisions made on 18 purposively selected applications, each of which was reviewed independently by three different RECs in a single strategic health authority. Decisions on 11 applications were consistent, but disparities were found among RECs on decisions on seven applications. An analysis of the agreement between decisions of RECs yielded an overall measure of agreement of κ = 0.286 (95% confidence interval −0.06 to 0.73), indicating a level of agreement that, although probably better than chance, may be described as “slight”. The small sample size limits the robustness of these findings. Further research on reasons for inconsistencies in decision making between RECs, and on the importance of such inconsistencies for a range of arguments, is needed.
- REC, research ethics committee
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: EA was employed as the Administrator to the Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland Research Ethics Committees during the period of the study. No other author has any conflict of interest.
Ethics approval: Support was sought and obtained from COREC in summer 2003. COREC confirmed that the project constituted service evaluation and development and therefore need not be reviewed by a Research Ethics Committee.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Research ethics committee decision-making in relation to an efficient neonatal trial
- Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
- Non-equivalent stringency of ethical review in the Baltic States: a sign of a systematic problem in Europe?
- Creating a ‘FatherConfessor’: the origins of research ethics committees in UK military medical research, 1950–1970. Part I, context and causes
- Implementation of the EU clinical trial regulation transforms the ethics committee systems and endangers ethical standards
- Registration audit of clinical trials given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees
- What do research ethics committees say about applications to conduct research involving children?
- Research ethics committees and paternalism
- Multicentre trials review process by research ethics committees in Spain: where do they stand before implementing the new European regulation?
- Research ethics committees in Europe: implementing the directive, respecting diversity