Article info
Global medical ethics
A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Correspondence to: B A Manninen Arizona State University, West Campus, 4701 West Thunderbird Road, Phoenix, A2 85 069; bertha.manninen{at}asu.edu
Citation
A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
Publication history
- Received October 31, 2005
- Accepted February 9, 2006
- Revised January 31, 2006
- First published October 30, 2006.
Online issue publication
October 30, 2006
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability
- Passive euthanasia
- Attitudes towards euthanasia in Iran: the role of altruism
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia
- Comparison of attitudes towards five end-of-life care interventions (active pain control, withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment, passive euthanasia, active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide): a multicentred cross-sectional survey of Korean patients with cancer, their family caregivers, physicians and the general Korean population
- Life support and euthanasia, a perspective on Shaw's new perspective
- Causal authorship and the equality principle: a defence of the acts/omissions distinction in euthanasia
- Medical murder in Belgium and the Netherlands
- Mr Marty’s muddle: a superficial and selective case for euthanasia in Europe
- The acceptability of ending a patient’s life