Citation Tools
PDFGlobal medical ethics
A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
Other content recommended for you
- Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability
- Passive euthanasia
- Attitudes towards euthanasia in Iran: the role of altruism
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia
- Comparison of attitudes towards five end-of-life care interventions (active pain control, withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment, passive euthanasia, active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide): a multicentred cross-sectional survey of Korean patients with cancer, their family caregivers, physicians and the general Korean population
- Life support and euthanasia, a perspective on Shaw's new perspective
- Causal authorship and the equality principle: a defence of the acts/omissions distinction in euthanasia
- Medical murder in Belgium and the Netherlands
- Mr Marty’s muddle: a superficial and selective case for euthanasia in Europe
- The acceptability of ending a patient’s life