Article info
PDFReproduction
Just another reproductive technology? The ethics of human reproductive cloning as an experimental medical procedure
- Correspondence to: D Elsner University of Melbourne, Australia; d.elsner{at}ugrad.unimelb.edu.au
Citation
Just another reproductive technology? The ethics of human reproductive cloning as an experimental medical procedure
Publication history
- Received July 27, 2005
- Accepted January 19, 2006
- Revised January 5, 2006
- First published September 29, 2006.
Online issue publication
February 19, 2018
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates: is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances?
- What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Embryonic stem cells: the disagreement debate and embryonic stem cell research in Israel
- Human reproductive cloning and reasons for deprivation
- Emotional reactions to human reproductive cloning
- Research Ethics, Science Policy, and Four Contexts for the Stem Cell Debate
- The significance of induced pluripotent stem cells for basic research and clinical therapy
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate