Human reproductive cloning (HRC) has not yet resulted in any live births. There has been widespread condemnation of the practice in both the scientific world and the public sphere, and many countries explicitly outlaw the practice. Concerns about the procedure range from uncertainties about its physical safety to questions about the psychological well-being of clones. Yet, key aspects such as the philosophical implications of harm to future entities and a comparison with established reproductive technologies such as in vitro fertilisation (IVF) are often overlooked in discussions about HRC. Furthermore, there are people who are willing to use the technology. Several scientists have been outspoken in their intent to pursue HRC. The importance of concerns about the physical safety of children created by HRC and comparisons with concerns about the safety of IVF are discussed. A model to be used to determine when it is acceptable to use HRC and other new assisted reproductive technologies, balancing reproductive freedom and safety concerns, is proposed. Justifications underpinning potential applications of HRC are discussed, and it is determined that these are highly analogous to rationalisations used to justify IVF treatment. It is concluded that people wishing to conceive using HRC should have a prima facie negative right to do so.
- ART, assisted reproductive technology
- HRC, human reproductive cloning
- IVF, in vitro fertilisation
- SCNT, somatic cell nuclear transfer
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates: is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances?
- What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Embryonic stem cells: the disagreement debate and embryonic stem cell research in Israel
- Human reproductive cloning and reasons for deprivation
- Emotional reactions to human reproductive cloning
- Research Ethics, Science Policy, and Four Contexts for the Stem Cell Debate
- The significance of induced pluripotent stem cells for basic research and clinical therapy
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate