Article info
PDFGeneral ethics
Killing people: what Kant could have said about suicide and euthanasia but did not
- Correspondence to: I Brassington School of Law, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Iain.Brassington{at}manchester.ac.uk
Citation
Killing people: what Kant could have said about suicide and euthanasia but did not
Publication history
- Received December 2, 2005
- Accepted January 13, 2006
- Revised January 10, 2006
- First published September 29, 2006.
Online issue publication
September 29, 2006
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Mr Marty’s muddle: a superficial and selective case for euthanasia in Europe
- Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy. An Argument Against Legislation
- Kant on euthanasia and the duty to die: clearing the air
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia
- A simple solution to the puzzles of end of life? Voluntary palliated starvation
- Euthanasia: above ground, below ground
- Ordering suicide: media reporting of family assisted suicide in Britain
- Medical Assistance in Dying at a paediatric hospital
- The body as unwarranted life support: a new perspective on euthanasia