Decisions at the end of life: an empirical study on the involvement, legal understanding and ethical views of preregistration house officers
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- End of life decisions: attitudes of Finnish physicians
- The do-not-resuscitate order: associations with advance directives, physician specialty and documentation of discussion 15 years after the Patient Self-Determination Act
- Evaluation of end of life care in cancer patients at a teaching hospital in Japan
- Physicians’ confidence in discussing do not resuscitate orders with patients and surrogates
- “Do-not-resuscitate” orders in patients with cancer at a children’s hospital in Taiwan
- Honouring patient's resuscitation wishes: a multiphased effort to improve identification and documentation
- Do Not Resuscitate orders and ethical decisions in a neonatal intensive care unit in a Muslim community
- Scale of levels of care versus DNR orders
- “Allow natural death” versus “do not resuscitate”: three words that can change a life
- Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?