Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Informing research participants of research results: analysis of Canadian university based research ethics board policies
- Correspondence to: Dr C Fernandez IWK Health Centre, PO Box 9700, 5850/5980 University Avenue, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3K 6R8 Canada; conrad.fernandez{at}iwk.nshealth.ca
Citation
Informing research participants of research results: analysis of Canadian university based research ethics board policies
Publication history
- Received September 17, 2004
- Accepted April 10, 2005
- Revised April 5, 2005
- First published December 22, 2005.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Attitudes of research ethics board chairs towards disclosure of research results to participants: results of a national survey
- Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards
- Reconsenting paediatric research participants for use of identifying data
- What does ‘respect for persons’ require? Attitudes and reported practices of genetics researchers in informing research participants about research
- Streamlining review of research involving humans: Canadian models
- Offering results to research participants
- Institutional conflict of interest: attempting to crack the deferiprone mystery
- Assessment of children's capacity to consent for research: a descriptive qualitative study of researchers' practices
- Exploring the experiences of substitute decision-makers with an exception to consent in a paediatric resuscitation randomised controlled trial: study protocol for a qualitative research study
- Understanding preferences for disclosure of individual biomarker results among participants in a longitudinal birth cohort