Article Text
Abstract
Background: Despite potential benefits of the return of research results to research participants, the TriCouncil Policy Statement (TCPS), which reflects Canadian regulatory ethical requirements, does not require this. The policies of Canadian research ethics boards (REBs) are unknown.
Objectives: To examine the policies of Canadian university based REBs regarding returning results to research participants, and to ascertain if the presence/absence of a policy may be influenced by REB member composition.
Design: Email survey of the coordinators of Canadian university based REBs to determine the presence/absence of a policy on return of research results to research participants both during an ongoing study and at conclusion. REB coordinators were asked to return a copy of the policy or guidelines and to describe the member composition of their REB.
Findings: Of 50 REBs that were contacted 34 (68%) responded and 22 (64.7%) met the inclusion criteria. Two (9.1%) had a policy that governed the return of research results while on a study, and seven (31.8%) following the completion of a study. Presence of an ethicist or a lawyer on the REB did not influence the presence/absence of such policies. No REBs had specific guidelines describing how participants should be informed of results.
Conclusions: Most REBs did not require researchers to disclose study results to research participants either during or following a study. Thus this study identifies an ethical shortcoming in the conduct of human research in Canada. It has also demonstrated that there are no clear recommendations by REBs to facilitate the return of results to participants following research projects.
- CAREB, Canadian Association of Research Ethics Boards
- REB, research ethics boards
- TCPS, TriCouncil Policy Statement
- research results
- disclosure
- participants
- research ethics committee
- member composition
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
This research was supported by a grant from the Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation, (Dalhousie Medical School, Halifax, Canada) and by an IWK Category A Grant (IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Canada)
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Attitudes of research ethics board chairs towards disclosure of research results to participants: results of a national survey
- Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards
- Reconsenting paediatric research participants for use of identifying data
- What does ‘respect for persons’ require? Attitudes and reported practices of genetics researchers in informing research participants about research
- Streamlining review of research involving humans: Canadian models
- Offering results to research participants
- Institutional conflict of interest: attempting to crack the deferiprone mystery
- Assessment of children's capacity to consent for research: a descriptive qualitative study of researchers' practices
- Exploring the experiences of substitute decision-makers with an exception to consent in a paediatric resuscitation randomised controlled trial: study protocol for a qualitative research study
- Understanding preferences for disclosure of individual biomarker results among participants in a longitudinal birth cohort