Article info
PDFLaw, ethics, and medicine
What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Correspondence to: MsK Devolder Centre for Environmental Philosophy and Bioethics, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; Katrien.devolder{at}ugent.be
Citation
What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
Publication history
- Received March 16, 2005
- Accepted April 20, 2005
- First published December 22, 2005.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2006 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells
- Embryonic stem cells: the disagreement debate and embryonic stem cell research in Israel
- Embryo as epiphenomenon: some cultural, social and economic forces driving the stem cell debate
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- How reproductive and regenerative medicine meet in a Chinese fertility clinic. Interviews with women about the donation of embryos to stem cell research
- Research Ethics, Science Policy, and Four Contexts for the Stem Cell Debate
- Regenerative medicine: stem cells and the science of monstrosity
- Making regulations and drawing up legislation in Islamic countries under conditions of uncertainty, with special reference to embryonic stem cell research
- Stem cell stories: from bedside to bench
- Embryo deaths in reproduction and embryo research: a reply to Murphy's double effect argument