Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Controversial choice of a control intervention in a trial of ventilator therapy in ARDS: standard of care arguments in a randomised controlled trial
- Correspondence to: H Mann Department of Radiology, Program Associate, Division of Medical Ethics, 1A71 University Hospital, 50 North Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA; Howard.Mannhsc.utah.edu
Citation
Controversial choice of a control intervention in a trial of ventilator therapy in ARDS: standard of care arguments in a randomised controlled trial
Publication history
- Received September 26, 2004
- Accepted November 17, 2004
- Revised November 14, 2004
- First published August 30, 2005.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2005 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Guidelines on the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury
- Progress in ARDS research: a protection racket?
- Multicentre, parallel, open-label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial on the prognosis of electrical impedance tomography-guided versus low PEEP/FiO2 table-guided PEEP setting: a trial protocol
- Low tidal volume ventilation is associated with reduced mortality in HIV-infected patients with acute lung injury
- Predictors of 6-month health utility outcomes in survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome
- Plasma receptor for advanced glycation end products and clinical outcomes in acute lung injury
- Lung protective mechanical ventilation and two year survival in patients with acute lung injury: prospective cohort study
- Plasma surfactant protein levels and clinical outcomes in patients with acute lung injury
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome