Article Text
Abstract
Objective: To examine current research payment practices and to inform development of clearer guidelines for researchers and ethics committees.
Design: Exploratory email based questionnaire study of current research participant reimbursement practices. A diverse sample of organisations and individuals were targeted.
Setting: Australia.
Participants: Contacts in 84 key research organisations and select electronic listservers across Australia. A total of 100 completed questionnaires were received with representations from a variety of research areas (for example, market, alcohol and drug, medical, pharmaceutical and social research).
Main measurements: Open-ended and fixed alternative questions about type of research agency; type of research; type of population under study; whether payment is standard; amounts and mechanisms of payment; factors taken into account when deciding on payment practices; and whether payment policies exist.
Results: Reimbursement practice is highly variable. Where it occurs (most commonly for drug dependent rather than health professional or general population samples) it is largely monetary and is for time and out-of-pocket expenses. Ethics committees were reported to be often involved in decision making around reimbursement.
Conclusions: Research subject payment practices vary in Australia. Researchers who do provide payments to research participants generally do so without written policy and procedures. Ethics committees have an important role in developing guidelines in this area. Specific guidelines are needed considering existing local policies and procedures; payment models and their application in diverse settings; case study examples of types and levels of reimbursement; applied definitions of incentive and inducement; and the rationale for diverse payment practices in different settings.
- ethics
- payment practices
- reimbursement
- research subject payment
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Collaboration and knowledge generation in an 18-year quality improvement research programme in Australian Indigenous primary healthcare: a coauthorship network analysis
- Questioning the ethics of evidence-based practice for Indigenous health and social settings in Australia
- Payment of research participants: current practice and policies of Irish research ethics committees
- On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers
- Development and validation of Australian aphasia rehabilitation best practice statements using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method
- Funding for cerebral palsy research in Australia, 2000–2015: an observational study
- The impact of funding deadlines on personal workloads, stress and family relationships: a qualitative study of Australian researchers
- An exploratory study of cannabis withdrawal among Indigenous Australian prison inmates: study protocol
- The impact of a streamlined funding application process on application time: two cross-sectional surveys of Australian researchers
- What was the impact of a participatory research project in Australian Indigenous primary healthcare services? Applying a comprehensive framework for assessing translational health research to Lessons for the Best