Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Project Examining Effectiveness in Clinical Ethics (PEECE): phase 1—descriptive analysis of nine clinical ethics services
- Correspondence to: M D Godkin 30 The Queensway, Toronto, Ontario M6R 1B5, Canada; godkindsmh.toronto.on.ca
Citation
Project Examining Effectiveness in Clinical Ethics (PEECE): phase 1—descriptive analysis of nine clinical ethics services
Publication history
- Received September 15, 2004
- Accepted November 25, 2004
- Revised November 19, 2004
- First published August 30, 2005.
Online issue publication
August 30, 2005
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2005 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Clinical bioethics integration, sustainability, and accountability: the Hub and Spokes Strategy
- Paediatric clinical ethics in Australia and New Zealand: a survey
- Development of clinical ethics services in the UK: a national survey
- What kinds of cases do paediatricians refer to clinical ethics? Insights from 184 case referrals at an Australian paediatric hospital
- Clinical ethicists’ perspectives on organisational ethics in healthcare organisations
- The need for a clinical ethics service and its goals in a community healthcare service centre: a survey
- Taking the burden off: a study of the quality of ethics consultation in the time of COVID-19
- How to read an ethics paper
- Ethics of fertility preservation for prepubertal children: should clinicians offer procedures where efficacy is largely unproven?
- Views regarding the training of ethics consultants: a survey of physicians caring for patients in ICU