Article Text
Research ethics
The reform of UK research ethics committees: throwing the baby out with the bath water?
Abstract
On 1 May 2004 research ethics committees became legally accountable to a new government body, the United Kingdom Ethics Committee Authority. This marks the end of the self regulation of research ethics. This paper describes how this change in research ethics committee status has come about and explores the implications for research subjects, researchers, institutions, and for regulation of research.
- RECs
- ethics
- regulation
- research
- self regulation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
S Kerrison is Assistant Director of Research and Development, UCH NHS Foundation Trust and Senior research fellow at School of Public Policy UCL, London.
-
A M Pollock is Director of Research and Development, UCH NHS Foundation Trust and Professor of Health Policy, School of Public Policy, UCL, London.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC
- Proportional ethical review and the identification of ethical issues
- New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants’ interest
- Efficiency and the proposed reforms to the NHS research ethics system
- The experiences of ethics committee members: contradictions between individuals and committees
- In defence of governance: ethics review and social research
- What are local issues? The problem of the local review of research
- Research involving storage and use of human tissue: how did the Human Tissue Act 2004 affect decisions by research ethics committees?
- United Kingdom research governance strategy
- Creating a ‘FatherConfessor’: the origins of research ethics committees in UK military medical research, 1950–1970. Part I, context and causes