Article Text
Abstract
The ethics of post-mortem organ retention and use is widely debated in bioethics and law. However, the fundamental ethical issues have often been inadequately treated. According to one argument, dead bodies are no longer “persons”. Given the great benefits dead bodies offer to human kind, they should be automatically treated as public property: when the person dies, the body becomes a public thing (a res publica, a republic). This paper articulates the ethical issues involved in organ and tissue retention and use, both in the case in which the deceased’s wishes are known and in the case in which the wishes are not known. It contends that a dead body is not a republic. The state should maximise availability of organs and tissues by inviting or requiring citizens to make an informed and responsible choice on the matter.
- ethics of organ and tissue retention and use
- organ transplants
- post-mortem decisions
- the role of the family
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Human tissue legislation: listening to the professionals
- Organ retention and return: problems of consent
- Presumed consent for transplantation: a dead issue after Alder Hey?
- Returning to the Alder Hey report and its reporting: addressing confusions and improving inquiries
- Stored human tissue: an ethical perspective on the fate of anonymous, archival material
- The Alder Hey affair
- They stole my baby’s soul: narratives of embodiment and loss
- In praise of unprincipled ethics
- An analysis of knowledge and attitudes of hospice staff towards organ and tissue donation
- Obtaining explicit consent for the use of archival tissue samples: practical issues