Article Text
Abstract
Ethical dilemmas in community mental health care is the focus of this article. The dilemmas are derived from a discussion of the results of a qualitative research project that took place in five countries of the European Union. The different stakeholders are confronted with the following dilemmas: community care versus hospital care (clients); a life with care versus a life without care (informal carers); stimulation of the client toward greater responsibility versus protection against such responsibility (professionals); budgetary control versus financial incentives (policy makers), and respect for the client versus particular private needs (neighbourhood residents). These dilemmas are interpreted against the background of a value based ethical model. This model offers an integral approach to the dilemmas and can be used to determine policy. The dilemmas are discussed here as the result of conflicting values—namely autonomy and privacy, support and safety, justice and participation, and trust and solidarity.
- Community care
- deinstitutionalisation
- ethical dilemmas
- mental health care
- participation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Primary care interventions and current service innovations in modifying long-term outcomes after stroke: a protocol for a scoping review
- Urgent care for patients with dementia: a scoping review of associated factors and stakeholder experiences
- Living and dying with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: multi-perspective longitudinal qualitative study
- Characteristics and well-being of urban informal home care providers during COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based study
- Living and dying with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: multi-perspective longitudinal qualitative study
- Conceptualisations of care: why understanding paid care is important
- Health professionals’ experience of implementing and delivering a ‘Community Care’ programme in metropolitan Melbourne: a qualitative reflexive thematic analysis
- Acceptability of compulsory powers in the community: the ethical considerations of mental health service users on Supervised Discharge and Guardianship
- Role and perspectives of informal care: a qualitative study of informal caregivers in the Republic of Croatia
- Perspectives on quality of care for people who experience disability