Article info
PDFResearch ethics
What is the role of the research ethics committee? Paternalism, inducements, and harm in research ethics
- Correspondence to: Eve Garrard Centre for Professional Ethics, Keele Hall, Keele University, Staffs, ST5 5BG, UK; e.garrardkeele.ac.uk
Citation
What is the role of the research ethics committee? Paternalism, inducements, and harm in research ethics
Publication history
- Received September 27, 2004
- Accepted September 29, 2004
- First published June 30, 2005.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2005 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Scientific research is a moral duty
- Clinical research with economically disadvantaged populations
- What makes clinical labour different? The case of human guinea pigging
- Reification and assent in research involving those who lack capacity
- Should research ethics committees be told how to think?
- “Fair’s fair argument” and voluntarism in clinical research: But, is it fair?
- Implementation of the EU clinical trial regulation transforms the ethics committee systems and endangers ethical standards
- A public health perspective on research ethics
- Health incentive research and social justice: does the risk of long term harms to systematically disadvantaged groups bear consideration?
- The influence of risk and monetary payment on the research participation decision making process