Responses
Current controversy
The challenge of Terri Schiavo: lessons for bioethics
Compose a Response to This Article
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- The lessons for bioethics for the management of end-of-life conflict: the need of prudence and mercyPublished on: 20 July 2005
- Published on: 20 July 2005The lessons for bioethics for the management of end-of-life conflict: the need of prudence and mercyShow More
Dear Editor,
What are the lessons arising from the complex case of Terri Schiavo for bioethics[1] and bioethicists and for the management of end-of-life conflict?[2] The most important lesson is that battles cannot be lead in order to the procedure of law to anticipate the dead of a human being. Rather, we must act humanly to see that every person dies naturally with all the possible care until the end.
...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
Other content recommended for you
- Withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: parental perspectives
- Neurological disorders, affective bioethics, and the nervous system: reconsidering the Schiavo case from a materialist perspective
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Disability matters in medical law
- Parenteral nutrition: ethical and legal considerations
- When slippery slope arguments miss the mark: a lesson from one against physician-assisted death
- ‘In a twilight world’? Judging the value of life for the minimally conscious patient
- A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness
- Challenging accepted ethical beliefs
- Causal authorship and the equality principle: a defence of the acts/omissions distinction in euthanasia