Article Text
Current controversy
The challenge of Terri Schiavo: lessons for bioethics
Abstract
This essay reviews a range of issues arising from the complex case of Terri Schiavo and the lessons the case raises for bioethicists. It argues that embedded in the case is a broader controversy than is immediately evident, one involving the definitions by which bioethics judge cases of extreme physical and psychological limits, in its principled form of address. Further, it argues that bioethicists who assume the issues involved in the case are settled miss the point of the emotional responses it has brought forth.
- bioethics
- disability
- end-of-life
- quality of life
- principle
- Terry Schiavo
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: parental perspectives
- Neurological disorders, affective bioethics, and the nervous system: reconsidering the Schiavo case from a materialist perspective
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Disability matters in medical law
- Parenteral nutrition: ethical and legal considerations
- When slippery slope arguments miss the mark: a lesson from one against physician-assisted death
- ‘In a twilight world’? Judging the value of life for the minimally conscious patient
- A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness
- Challenging accepted ethical beliefs
- Causal authorship and the equality principle: a defence of the acts/omissions distinction in euthanasia