Article Text
Law, ethics, and medicine
Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells
Abstract
The compromise position that accepts the use and derivation of stem cells from spare in vitro fertilisation embryos but opposes the creation of embryos for these purposes is a very weak ethical position. This paper argues that whatever the basis is on which defenders of this viewpoint accord intrinsic value to the embryo, once they accept the creation and sacrifice of embryos to benefit infertile people with a child-wish, they do not have a sound moral argument to condemn the creation and sacrifice of embryos to benefit ill and injured people.
- cloning
- embryo research
- stem cells
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Research Ethics, Science Policy, and Four Contexts for the Stem Cell Debate
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- How reproductive and regenerative medicine meet in a Chinese fertility clinic. Interviews with women about the donation of embryos to stem cell research
- Embryonic stem cells: the disagreement debate and embryonic stem cell research in Israel
- Embryo deaths in reproduction and embryo research: a reply to Murphy's double effect argument
- Ethical and legal aspects of stem cell practices in Turkey: where are we?
- In vitro eugenics
- Embryo as epiphenomenon: some cultural, social and economic forces driving the stem cell debate
- Going high and low: on pluralism and neutrality in human embryology policy-making