Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The moral status of the embryo post-Dolly
  1. Catherine Stanton,
  2. John Harris
  1. School of Law, University of Manchester, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 John Harris


Cameron and Williamson have provided a provocative and timely review of the ethical questions prompted by the birth of Dolly. The question Cameron and Williamson seek to address is “In the world of Dolly, when does a human embryo acquire respect?”. Their initial discussion sets the scene by providing a valuable overview of attitudes towards the embryo, summarising various religious, scientific, and philosophical viewpoints. They then ask, “What has Dolly changed?” and identify five changes, the first being that fertilisation is no longer required to create an embryo. Following this analysis they then ask when an embryo created other than by fertilisation begins to acquire respect. This paper explores the ethical and legal issues highlighted by Cameron and Williamson’s paper.

  • CNR, cell nuclear replacement
  • HFEA, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990
  • IVF, in vitro fertilisation
  • embryo
  • moral status
  • cell nucleus replacement
  • in vitro fertilisation
  • Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.