Article Text
Abstract
For most of the 20th century, it was possible to regard fertilisation as the identifiable point when life begins, because this moment could be defined unequivocally and was thought to be the single most essential biological step in the establishment of a new human entity. Since the successful reproductive cloning of Dolly and other mammals, it is clear that any human cell has the potential to supply the full genome of an embryo, and hence a person, without going through fertilisation. At what point in time do such embryos acquire the respect accorded to human beings? The authors argue that the time of implantation is the most useful point at which the potential and the intention to create a new person are translated into reality, because from that point a new life develops. Implantation differentiates a somatic cell in culture (which is not due respect) from a human entity that has acquired its own identity and developmental potential. The authors examine the value of quickening or viability as alternative developmental stages in the process of acquiring respect for the Dolly embryo.
- cloning
- fetus
- abortion
- viability
- Dolly the sheep
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’?
- The moral status of the embryo post-Dolly
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- A natural stem cell therapy? How novel findings and biotechnology clarify the ethics of stem cell research
- Embryonic stem cell production through therapeutic cloning has fewer ethical problems than stem cell harvest from surplus IVF embryos
- The common premise for uncommon conclusions
- Research guidelines for embryoids
- Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
- In vitro eugenics
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate