Informed choice is increasingly recognised as important in supporting patient autonomy and ensuring that people are neither deceived nor coerced. In cancer screening the emphasis has shifted away from just promoting the benefits of screening to providing comprehensive information to enable people to make an informed choice. Cancer screening programmes in the UK now have policies in place which state that it is their responsibility to ensure that individuals are making an individual informed choice. There is a need to evaluate whether such policies mean that those people invited for screening are making informed choices, and how comprehensive information affects other variables such as uptake, cost effectiveness, and satisfaction. At the present time, there is no validated measure of informed choice in cancer screening. Such a measure could be used to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to increase informed choice and levels of informed choice in a population invited for screening. It could encourage health professionals to be accountable. Factors important when measuring informed choice in cancer screening include an individual’s understanding of the limitations of screening, the ability to make an autonomous choice, and the difference between choice and behaviour.
- GMC, General Medical Council
- NSC, National Screening Committee
- informed choice
- cancer screening
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Sources of support: Chief Scientist Office, Scotland
Other content recommended for you
- Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences
- “Informed choice” in a time of too much medicine—no panacea for ethical difficulties
- Randomised trial to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of offering postvisit decision support and assistance in obtaining physician-recommended colorectal cancer screening: the e-assist: Colon Health study—a protocol study
- Screening for cardiovascular risk: public health imperative or matter for individual informed choice?
- What do European women know about their female cancer risks and cancer screening? A cross-sectional online intervention survey in five European countries
- Psychological correlates of free colorectal cancer screening uptake in a Scottish sample: a cross-sectional observational study
- Effect of evidence based risk information on “informed choice” in colorectal cancer screening: randomised controlled trial
- Concerns, perceived need and competing priorities: a qualitative exploration of decision-making and non-participation in a population-based flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme to prevent colorectal cancer
- Infant hearing screening: route to informed choice
- A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: randomised controlled trial