Article Text
Global medical ethics
Blinkered objections to bioethics: a response to Benatar
Abstract
In a recent commentary, S R Benatar criticised the debates over organ donation and kidney selling for being located within a “narrow and inadequate framework”. Benatar levels four charges against those who engage in the current organs debate: that they myopically focus on saving lives; that they accept the dominance of market orientated approaches to health care; that they reify individualism, and that they engage in limited moral arguments. Given the importance of the organs debate it is imperative that the misunderstandings of it on which Benatar’s criticisms are based are dispelled. Accordingly, I will consider and reject each of his objections in turn.
- Benatar
- ethics
- kidneys
- market
- organs
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Blinkered bioethics
- The virtues (and vices) of the four principles
- A virtue ethics approach to moral dilemmas in medicine
- Different approach to medical decision-making in difficult circumstances: Kittay’s Ethics of Care
- Principlism and communitarianism
- Moral flux in primary care: the effect of complexity
- Self-interest, self-abnegation and self-esteem: towards a new moral economy of non-directed kidney donation
- Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”
- A “Queen of Hearts” trial of organ markets: why Scheper-Hughes’s objections to markets in human organs fail
- Professional-patient relationships and informed consent