Article Text
Abstract
This paper examines whether the modern bioethical principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice proposed by Beauchamp and Childress are existent in, compatible with, or acceptable to the leading Chinese moral philosophy—the ethics of Confucius. The author concludes that the moral values which the four prima facie principles uphold are expressly identifiable in Confucius’ teachings. However, Confucius’ emphasis on the filial piety, family values, the “love of gradation”, altruism of people, and the “role specified relation oriented ethics” will inevitably influence the “specification” and application of these bioethical principles and hence tend to grant “beneficence” a favourable position that diminishes the respect for individual rights and autonomy. In contrast, the centrality of respect for autonomy and its stance of “first among equals” are more and more stressed in Western liberal viewpoints. Nevertheless, if the Confucian “doctrine of Mean” (chung-yung) and a balanced “two dimensional personhood” approach are properly employed, this will require both theorists and clinicians, who are facing medical ethical dilemmas, of searching to attain due mean out of competing moral principles thus preventing “giving beneficence a priority” or “asserting autonomy must triumph”.
- Confucius’ ethics
- principlism
- bioethical principles
- cross cultural bioethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood
- Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics
- Determining the common morality's norms in the sixth edition of Principles of Biomedical Ethics
- Medical ethics for children: applying the four principles to paediatrics
- Informed consent in neurosurgery—translating ethical theory into action
- What principlism misses
- First among equals? Adaptive preferences and the limits of autonomy in medical ethics
- In defence of personal autonomy
- Sweetening the scent: commentary on “What principlism misses”