Article Text
Reproduction
The ethics of using genetic engineering for sex selection
Abstract
It is quite likely that parents will soon be able to use genetic engineering to select the sex of their child by directly manipulating the sex of an embryo. Some might think that this method would be a more ethical method of sex selection than present technologies such as preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) because, unlike PGD, it does not need to create and destroy “wrong gendered” embryos. This paper argues that those who object to present technologies on the grounds that the embryo is a person are unlikely to be persuaded by this proposal, though for different reasons.
- PGD, preimplantation genetic diagnosis
- preimplantation genetic diagnosis
- genetic engineering
- sex selection
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Gender “tailored” conceptions: should the option of embryo gender selection be available to infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology?
- Sex selection for social purposes in Israel: quest for the “perfect child” of a particular gender or centuries old prejudice against women?
- Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: medical and non-medical uses
- An analysis of US fertility centre educational materials suggests that informed consent for preimplantation genetic diagnosis may be inadequate
- Preimplantation genetic testing
- Ethics of using preimplantation genetic diagnosis to select a stem cell donor for an existing person
- Can sex selection be ethically tolerated?
- Just diagnosis? Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and injustices to disabled people
- Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and rational choice under risk or uncertainty
- Britain’s new preimplantation tissue typing policy: an ethical defence