Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
The debate on hypoxic air devices is of interest to me as a doctor, a researcher, and an active participant in a number of committees and bodies which are concerned with ethics and doping. I write this commentary as a personal contributor though, and not as a representative of any particular organisation or authority.
The issues here appear to revolve around the concept of cheating in order to gain an unfair advantage in a sporting contest. The use of artificial means to enhance performance immediately raises eyebrows because of an unease about using other than “natural” (dare I say “God given”?) talents to compete (and win) at sport. There is a perception that cheating implies anything that appears to enhance performance by non-natural physical or chemical means. …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Position statement—altitude training for improving team-sport players’ performance: current knowledge and unresolved issues
- Does ‘altitude training’ increase exercise performance in elite athletes?
- Could altitude training benefit team-sport athletes?
- Determinants of team-sport performance: implications for altitude training by team-sport athletes
- Recommendations for altitude training programming to preserve athletes’ health after the COVID-19 pandemic
- Hypoxic air machines: performance enhancement through effective training—or cheating?
- Yin and yang, or peas in a pod? Individual-sport versus team-sport athletes and altitude training
- Relationship between changes in haemoglobin mass and maximal oxygen uptake after hypoxic exposure
- Individual variation in the erythropoietic response to altitude training in elite junior swimmers
- Improving team-sport player’s physical performance with altitude training: from beliefs to scientific evidence