Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
To resort to hypoxic air machines—would that be to cheat? This clearly depends on whether such machines are prohibited or not. So the important question is this: Should sport authorities prohibit them or not?
One way of approaching this question may be to argue casuistically. Erythropoietin (EPO) is prohibited. Blood doping is prohibited. Training at high altitude is allowed. Does the hypoxic air machine bear more resemblance to training at high altitude than to the use of EPO? If that is the case it should not be prohibited. If, on the other hand, it bears more resemblance to the use of EPO, then it should be prohibited.
However, to argue casuistically is not entirely satisfactory. Even if, through such reasoning, we reach an answer, we do not obtain a principled explanation of the answer. We may get a hint at what to do (allow or prohibit), but not at why we should do so.1 So the question need to be posed at a more principled level: If rules against doping in sport are to be …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Why we should allow performance enhancing drugs in sport
- Commentary
- Individual variation in the erythropoietic response to altitude training in elite junior swimmers
- o2max, blood doping, and erythropoietin
- On the argument that enhancement is “cheating”
- Should athletes be allowed to use performance enhancing drugs?
- Challenges and threats to implementing the fight against doping in sport
- The sleep of elite athletes at sea level and high altitude: a comparison of sea-level natives and high-altitude natives (ISA3600)
- Erythropoietin as a cardioprotective agent: down but not out
- Health risk for athletes at moderate altitude and normobaric hypoxia