Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Medical electives have long been part of the undergraduate curriculum, and many students choose to undertake a placement in a developing country. In countries where healthcare provision is hugely underresourced, students have found themselves under pressure to exceed their role. They have been expected to diagnose and treat patients without direct supervision from a qualified doctor. Some have found themselves running clinics and wards; others have found themselves to be the most qualified person available.1,2
The British Medical Journal believes students should not take on the role of a qualified doctor, “irrespective of any encouragement which students may receive from members of the host organisations to which they are attached”.3 This includes not diagnosing, prescribing, or treating any patient without strict clinical supervision. They feel that students fail to appreciate the dangers of treatment, particularly where familiar medical problems are complicated by unfamiliar poverty. Their deontological view is saying that students should treat their work …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Medical students’ experiences and perception of support following the death of a patient in the UK, and while overseas during their elective period
- Practising on the poor?
- ‘He's going to be a doctor in August’: a narrative interview study of medical students' and their educators' experiences of aligned and misaligned assistantships
- Medical students as agents of change: a qualitative exploratory study
- The interpretability of doctor identification badges in UK hospitals: a survey of nurses and patients
- Value of a UK medical degree for international students (VISION): a cross-sectional study
- Nutrition education in medical school: the case of international medical students in China
- Medical education and patients’ responsibilities: back to the future?
- Knowing when to say “no” on the student elective
- Educational impact and recommendations from implementation of student-led clinical trial recruitment: a mixed-methods study