Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Principlism and moral dilemmas: a new principle
- Correspondence to: J P DeMarco Department of Philosophy, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio USA; j.demarcocsuohio.edu
Citation
Principlism and moral dilemmas: a new principle
Publication history
- Received January 5, 2004
- Accepted June 21, 2004
- Revised June 19, 2004
- First published January 28, 2005.
Online issue publication
January 28, 2005
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2005 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics
- The bioethical principles and Confucius’ moral philosophy
- What principlism misses
- When four principles are too many: a commentary
- Is procreative beneficence obligatory?
- Judgement and the role of the metaphysics of values in medical ethics
- Ethics in epidemiology and public health I. Technical terms
- The best interest standard and children: clarifying a concept and responding to its critics
- The virtues (and vices) of the four principles