Article Text
Medical ethics
The tension between self governance and absolute inner worth in Kant’s moral philosophy
Abstract
The concepts of autonomy as the self governance of individuals and dignity as the inner worth of human beings play an important role in contemporary bioethics. Since both notions are crucial to Immanuel Kant’s moral theory, it would be tempting to think that Kantian ethics could ease the friction between the two concepts. It is argued in this paper, however, that this line of thought cannot be supported by Kant’s original ideas. While he did make a conscious effort to bring autonomy and dignity together, his emphasis on the absolute inner worth of our collective humanity made it impossible for him to embrace fully the personal self determination of individuals, as it is usually understood in today’s liberal thinking.
- autonomy
- dignity
- ethics
- Kant
- Kantian
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Prescribing cannabis: freedom, autonomy, and values
- Kant on euthanasia and the duty to die: clearing the air
- Making sense of dignity
- What moral work can Nussbaum’s account of human dignity do in the context of dementia care?
- Medicating the mind: a Kantian analysis of overprescribing psychoactive drugs
- In defence of Kant’s moral prohibition on suicide solely to avoid suffering
- Respect for autonomy: deciding what is good for oneself
- Authenticity and autonomy in deep-brain stimulation
- Dignitarian medical ethics
- Ideals of patient autonomy in clinical decision making: a study on the development of a scale to assess patients’ and physicians’ views