Article info
PDFGlobal medical ethics
Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
- Correspondence to: D F-C Tsai Department of Social Medicine and Department of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, No 1, Section 1, Jen-Ai Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan; fctsaiha.mc.ntu.edu.tw
Citation
Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
Publication history
- Received February 12, 2005
- Accepted February 16, 2005
- First published November 3, 2005.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2005 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Human embryonic stem cells and respect for life
- Are those who subscribe to the view that early embryos are persons irrational and inconsistent? A reply to Brock
- Ethics for embryos
- Why two arguments from probability fail and one argument from Thomson’s analogy of the violinist succeeds in justifying embryo destruction in some situations
- Stem cell-derived embryo models: moral advance or moral obfuscation?
- Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells
- The moral value of induced pluripotent stem cells: a Japanese bioethics perspective on human embryo research
- Can artificial parthenogenesis sidestep ethical pitfalls in human therapeutic cloning? An historical perspective
- Stem cell stories: from bedside to bench