Article info
PDFReproduction
Acting parentally: an argument against sex selection
- Correspondence to: R McDougall Mansfield College, Oxford OX1 3TF, UK; rosalind.mcdougallmansfield.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Acting parentally: an argument against sex selection
Publication history
- Received March 16, 2004
- Accepted January 11, 2005
- Revised October 12, 2004
- First published September 30, 2005.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2005 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Sex selection and regulated hatred
- Sex selection for social purposes in Israel: quest for the “perfect child” of a particular gender or centuries old prejudice against women?
- No sex selection please, we’re British
- Bach to the future: response to: Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: medical and non-medical uses
- The virtues (and vices) of the four principles
- Getting beyond the welfare of the child in assisted reproduction
- Why sex selection should be legal
- Reproductive liberty and elitist contempt: reply to John Harris
- Good parents would not fulfil their obligation to genetically enhance their unborn children
- Multiplex parenting: IVG and the generations to come