Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Acting parentally: an argument against sex selection
  1. R McDougall
  1. Correspondence to:
 R McDougall
 Mansfield College, Oxford OX1 3TF, UK; rosalind.mcdougallmansfield.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority’s (HFEA) recent restrictive recommendations on sex selection have highlighted the need for consideration of the plausibility of ethical arguments against sex selection. In this paper, the author suggests a parental virtues approach to some questions of reproductive ethics (including sex selection) as a superior alternative to an exclusively harm focused approach such as the procreative liberty framework. The author formulates a virtue ethics argument against sex selection based on the idea that acceptance is a character trait of the good parent. It is concluded that, because the argument presented posits a wrong in the sex selecting agent’s action that is not a harm, the argument could not function as a justification of the HFEA’s restrictive position in light of their explicit commitment to procreative liberty; it does, however, suggest that ethical approaches focused exclusively on harm fail to capture all the relevant moral considerations and thus that we should look beyond such approaches.

  • HFEA, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority
  • sex selection
  • virtue ethics
  • parenthood
  • procreative liberty

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • This work was funded by the Commonwealth Scholarship Commission.