Article info
PDFMedical ethics
Can arguments address concerns?
- Correspondence to: Matti HäyryCentre for Social Ethics and Policy, School of Law, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; matti.hayrymanchester.ac.uk
Citation
Can arguments address concerns?
Publication history
- Received July 9, 2004
- Accepted January 20, 2005
- Revised January 18, 2005
- First published September 30, 2005.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2005 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- The debate about physician assistance in dying: 40 years of unrivalled progress in medical ethics?
- Bioethics: why philosophy is essential for progress
- Moral pluralism versus the total view: why Singer is wrong about radical life extension
- Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras
- A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability
- The use of vignettes within a Delphi exercise: a useful approach in empirical ethics?
- Normative consent and organ donation: a vindication
- Cui bono? Good for whom? Some apologies, confessions, musings, unsubstantiated views, not empirically founded statements, lists, a few commandments, reading suggestions, and rather practical tips for aspiring and experienced bioethicists
- Genetic information, discrimination, philosophical pluralism and politics
- How should we treat human–pig chimeras, non-chimeric pigs and other beings of uncertain moral status?