Article metrics
PDF
Other content recommended for you
- Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial
- Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial
- Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models
- Journal editors’ perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
- Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes
- The ethics of peer review in bioethics
- Prepublication histories and open peer review at The BMJ
- Perspectives on involvement in the peer-review process: surveys of patient and public reviewers at two journals
- Blinding reviewers to authors' identity does not improve quality
- A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trials