Article info
PDFReproduction
Of souls, selves, and cerebrums: a reply to Himma
- Correspondence to: F J Beckwith J M Dawson Institute of Church-State Studies, Baylor University; Waco, Texas, USA; Francis_Beckwithbaylor.edu
Citation
Of souls, selves, and cerebrums: a reply to Himma
Publication history
- Accepted July 14, 2004
- First published January 5, 2005.
Online issue publication
January 05, 2005
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2005 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- A future like ours revisited
- A dualist analysis of abortion: personhood and the concept of self qua experiential subject
- Why should the baby live? Human right to life and the precautionary principle
- Savulescu’s objections to the future of value argument
- After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
- Cursed lamp: the problem of spontaneous abortion
- Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’?
- Philosophy, critical thinking and ‘after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?’
- A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability