Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Eliminating the daily life risks standard from the definition of minimal risk
- Correspondence to: Dr D B Resnik National Institute of Environmental Health Science, National Institute of Health, Box 12233, NH06, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709; resnikdniehs.nih.gov
Citation
Eliminating the daily life risks standard from the definition of minimal risk
Publication history
- Received September 1, 2004
- Accepted September 6, 2004
- First published January 5, 2005.
Online issue publication
January 05, 2005
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2005 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Is there an objective way to compare research risks?
- Drug development for children: how adequate is the current European ethical guidance?
- Streamlining the Clinical Research Enterprise
- Developing capacity to protect human research subjects in a post-conflict, resource-constrained setting: procedures and prospects
- Process of risk assessment by research ethics committees: foundations, shortcomings and open questions
- Reconsidering ‘minimal risk’ to expand the repertoire of trials with waiver of informed consent for research
- Implications of the concept of minimal risk in research on informed choice in clinical practice
- Variations in institutional review board processes and consent requirements for trauma research: an EAST multicenter survey
- Ensuring respect for persons in COMPASS: a cluster randomised pragmatic clinical trial
- Clinical Research From Proposal to Implementation