Article Text
Law, ethics and medicine
Private or intimate relations between doctor and patient: is zero tolerance warranted?
Abstract
This article reviews and comments on the five categories of arguments used to defend zero tolerance with regard to sexual contacts resulting from the physician-patient relationship as summarised by Cullen. In addition it puts forward a hypothesis—“fear of loss by third party”—as a psychological explanation for the collective insistence on a zero tolerance policy.
- PPR, physician-patient relationship
- bioethics
- sexuality
- physician-patient relations
- attitude of health personnel
- professional
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Sex and the surgery: students’ attitudes and potential behaviour as they pass through a modern medical curriculum
- Zero tolerance against patriarchal norms? A cross-sectional study of Swedish physicians’ attitudes towards young females requesting virginity certificates or hymen restoration
- Is there a moral duty for doctors to trust patients?
- Sexual exposure and sexual behaviour in the interval between gonorrhoea treatment and test of cure: a cross-sectional cohort study
- Relation between policies and work related assault: Minnesota Nurses’ Study
- Sparing the doctor’s blushes: the use of sexually explicit films for the purpose of Sexual Attitude Reassessment (SAR) in the training of medical practitioners in Britain during the 1970s
- An AIDS lexicon
- Practice of informed consent in Guangdong, China: a qualitative study from the perspective of in-hospital patients
- Doctor–patient sexual relationships in medical oaths
- Patient–physician mistrust and violence against physicians in Guangdong Province, China: a qualitative study