Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Philosophers should be wary of using the methods they use in philosophy when engaging in discussions about policy making
The beginning of November last year was a busy time in the bioethics calendar with four conferences taking place in New Zealand and Australia. The Fifth International Conference on Priorities in Health Care took place in Wellington; the Fifth Feminist Approaches to Bioethics congress, the Seventh World Congress of Bioethics, and the meeting of the Australasian Bioethics Association were all in Sydney.
One of the interesting features of these meetings was a move to a deeper exploration of the relations between ethics and political theory and political philosophy. The factors that drive this exploration are manifold but the four most important seem to be: 1) that ethicists often comment on, or propose political action and regulation; 2) that there is a growing awareness that the basic national and international societal and legal structures profoundly influences ethical issues; 3) the growing interest in global and third world issues, and 4) the move in many countries toward greater public participation in decision making concerning ethically contentious issues. All of these developments move the focus from the traditional subject matter of medical ethics—that is, the individual ethically charged action, to the question of how ethics should influence political action and regulation.
To …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Deliberative ethics in a biomedical institution: an example of integration between science and ethics
- Empirical research in bioethical journals. A quantitative analysis
- Legitimacy in bioethics: challenging the orthodoxy
- The transformation of (bio)ethics expertise in a world of ethical pluralism
- Resource expenditure not resource allocation: response to McDougall on cloning and dignity
- Arguments at cross-purposes: moral epistemology and medical ethics
- Bioethics and multiculturalism: nuancing the discussion
- What is it to do good medical ethics? A kaleidoscope of views
- Harmful rights-doing? The perceived problem of liberal paradigms and public health
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles