You are here

Article Text

Article menu

This article has a Reply. Please see:

Download PDFPDF
Letter
Symposium on consent and confidentiality. J Med Ethics 2003;29:2–40
  1. J Schildmann1,
  2. A Cushing2,
  3. L Doyal2,
  4. J Vollmann3
  1. 1Institute for History of Medicine and Medical Ethics and Department of Medicine III, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
  2. 2Department of Human Science and Medical Ethics, Queen Mary’s School Of Medicine and Dentistry, Barts and The London, London, UK
  3. 3Institute for History of Medicine and Medical Ethics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
  1. Correspondence to:
 J Schildmann
 Institute for History of Medicine and Medical Ethics and Department of Medicine III, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany; jan.schildmannethik.med.uni-erlangen.de

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2003.004192

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    We read with interest the papers on informed consent published in a recent issue of the Journal of Medical Ethics.1 Whatever their differences, and however much they questioned some aspects of the duty to respect autonomy through attempting to obtain informed consent for therapeutic interventions, there was general agreement that competent adult patients are entitled to a core of basic information about their treatment options. There was also consensus that training in the process of obtaining consent is important. In our experience, two dimensions of such training are of particular interest. On the one hand, students require good …

    View Full Text

    Linked Articles

    Other content recommended for you