Article info
PDFGenetics
The person, the soul, and genetic engineering
- Correspondence to: J C Polkinghorne Queens’ College, Cambridge CB3 9ET, UK; rcosterbmjgroup.com
Citation
The person, the soul, and genetic engineering
Publication history
- Accepted June 16, 2003
- First published November 30, 2004.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2004 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- The moral status of the embryo post-Dolly
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Is conceiving a child to benefit another against the interests of the new child?
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
- What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia
- Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells
- Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates: is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances?
- Why two arguments from probability fail and one argument from Thomson’s analogy of the violinist succeeds in justifying embryo destruction in some situations