Article info
PDFReproduction
Cell phoney: human cloning after Quintavalle
- Correspondence to: Derek Morgan Cardiff Law School, PO Box 427, Cardiff CF10 3XJ, Wales; morgandm1cardiff.ac.uk
Citation
Cell phoney: human cloning after Quintavalle
Publication history
- Received March 31, 2003
- Accepted April 3, 2003
- First published November 30, 2004.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2004 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells
- Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates: is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances?
- Research Ethics, Science Policy, and Four Contexts for the Stem Cell Debate
- Why the apparent haste to clone humans?
- The significance of induced pluripotent stem cells for basic research and clinical therapy
- Embryonic stem cells: the disagreement debate and embryonic stem cell research in Israel
- Law and policy in the era of reproductive genetics