Article info
PDFEnd of life
Surveys on attitudes towards legalisation of euthanasia: importance of question phrasing
- Correspondence to: Dr J Hagelin Synalsvagen 10, SE 757 57 Uppsala, Sweden; jh14hotmail.com
Citation
Surveys on attitudes towards legalisation of euthanasia: importance of question phrasing
Publication history
- Received November 15, 2002
- Accepted March 17, 2003
- Revised February 20, 2003
- First published November 30, 2004.
Online issue publication
November 30, 2004
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2004 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- End-of-life decisions in medical practice: a survey of doctors in Victoria (Australia)
- French hospital nurses’ opinion about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a national phone survey
- Finnish physicians’ attitudes towards active euthanasia have become more positive over the last 10 years
- Should euthanasia be legal? An international survey of neonatal intensive care units staff
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia
- French district nurses’ opinions towards euthanasia, involvement in end-of-life care and nurse–patient relationship: a national phone survey
- Comparison of attitudes towards five end-of-life care interventions (active pain control, withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment, passive euthanasia, active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide): a multicentred cross-sectional survey of Korean patients with cancer, their family caregivers, physicians and the general Korean population
- Development of palliative care and legalisation of euthanasia: antagonism or synergy?
- Reporting of euthanasia in medical practice in Flanders, Belgium: cross sectional analysis of reported and unreported cases
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol