Article info
Sports ethics
Compulsory brain scans and genetic tests for boxers—or should boxing be banned?
- Correspondence to: Dr M Spriggs Ethics Unit, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia; merle.spriggsmcri.edu.au
Citation
Compulsory brain scans and genetic tests for boxers—or should boxing be banned?
Publication history
- Received March 4, 2003
- Accepted February 9, 2004
- Revised March 6, 2003
- First published October 5, 2004.
Online issue publication
October 05, 2004
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2004 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- A systematic review of potential long-term effects of sport-related concussion
- The risk of chronic traumatic brain injury in professional boxing: change in exposure variables over the past century
- Amateur boxing and risk of chronic traumatic brain injury: systematic review of observational studies
- Boxing and the risk of chronic brain injury
- Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in sport: a systematic review
- Clinics in neurology and neurosurgery–extradural and subdural haematoma
- The search for meaningful comparisons in boxing and medical ethics
- Cavum septi pellucidi—a reason to ban boxers?
- A punch drunk jockey?
- What is the evidence for chronic concussion-related changes in retired athletes: behavioural, pathological and clinical outcomes?