Law, ethics and medicine
The right not to know: an autonomy based approach
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- The new genetics: Genetic testing and public policy
- Clinical applications of preimplantation genetic testing
- Balancing autonomy and responsibility: the ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information
- Familial genetic risks: how can we better navigate patient confidentiality and appropriate risk disclosure to relatives?
- From proband to provider: is there an obligation to inform genetic relatives of actionable risks discovered through direct-to-consumer genetic testing?
- Genetic counselling in ALS: facts, uncertainties and clinical suggestions
- Genetic discrimination in life insurance: empirical evidence from a cross sectional survey of genetic support groups in the United Kingdom
- Genetics and public health—evolution, or revolution?
- Perceptions of genetic discrimination among people at risk for Huntington’s disease: a cross sectional survey
- An evaluation of needs of female BRCA1and BRCA2 carriers undergoing genetic counselling